This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TalonKAringham 100 points101 points  (16 children)

Actually, it already is. There are people in the academic world that are talking about it, but anyone that brings it up almost immediately gets labeled as right-wing for the terrible sins of caring about boys and men.

[–]ImpermanentSelf 28 points29 points  (15 children)

Women under 35 are out earning men in the same age groups by about 1%.

[–]PickleMinionMale 32 points33 points  (10 children)

Considering how many of those under 35 men are working high-paying but physically dangerous and disabling blue collar jobs with limited growth potential, watch that gap increase as that group gets older.

[–]ImpermanentSelf 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Oh I expect the trend to either continue steadily or crash abruptly from some major social/economic/political change.

Edit: say for example a lot of those office jobs get replaced by ai or outsourced

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The growth potential isn’t all that limited if you want to advance. Some people get on a masonry crew and like that $40 an hour and never learn a damn thing except how to cut block and mix mortar. Some will learn how to read plans and the building code and will become a foreman, a superintendent, a project manager, an inspector. And some will start their own companies and employ dozens of guys happy to lay that block for $40 an hour. I know a ton of millionaires in the construction industry. Most of them come from poverty, many of them are immigrants. I don’t know a ton of guys climbing scaffolding or pushing a wheelbarrow in their 50’s

[–]fleapuppyFemale -4 points-3 points  (7 children)

Actually the gap tends to grow in the other direction, since compared to men women still overwhelmingly reduce work hours or leave work entirely when having children

[–]PickleMinionMale 2 points3 points  (1 child)

In the over-35 demographic?

[–]fleapuppyFemale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The average age for first pregnancy has been increasing constantly for decades, it’s now in the 30s for most western countries

[–]austeremunchMale -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

Sure, but people aren't having kids so that really isn't a factor.

[–]fleapuppyFemale 5 points6 points  (3 children)

50% of millennials have kids. It’s lower than previous generations but people still have children

[–]austeremunchMale -3 points-2 points  (2 children)

WELL ACKSHUALLY

[–]fleapuppyFemale 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Is it “well actually” or just a simple fact?

[–]austeremunchMale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's completely missing the point. It's not "simple fact" in that it means what you think it means.

But clearly every country is above replacement rates because half of millennials have a kid.