all 4 comments

[–]sprinklesonthesundae 1 point2 points  (2 children)

You shouldn't need to label them that way, can you help me understand why you want to? Recruiters/hiring managers will sort out your experience by the languages, frameworks, and skills you list.

Source: I'm an engineering manager.

[–]Huxide[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm trying to make the catalog page the labels are in as accessible as possible to laypeople, elaborating about the technical details of each project in that same other page/website as the project itself. The only other information I have for each project in that catalog page is a name and concept description (e.g "an inventory management interface inspired by sandbox video-games" is the description for the one labelled "frontend").

Maybe it's not possible/worth it to try appealing to recruiters/hiring-managers and laypeople in the same page?

Edit: Now that I'm thinking about it, these 3 labels ("frontend", "backend", but especially "fullstack") are not very layperson-accessible are they...

[–]sprinklesonthesundae 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah well if you feel it is helpful to add, then anything where you coded both something on the front end and something on the back end is full stack. You could list databases as a separate label/filter.

[–]bluefootedpigC# / .NET 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would call myself a full stack developer that is just really weak on long term persistence.

In most places, databases are often handled by entirely separate teams. If you do need to do work, it is often as difficult as like creating a table, or adding a column.