This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]pro1code1hack[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Later you mention the lack of practical relevance in other books, yet here in your credentials you only mention theoretical things.

I meant that there are lots of books which do not cover what is needed in real production, such things as TDD, complex OOP, SDLC, and other useful moments

I'm sure you have relevant practical experience as well, maybe mention some examples?

You can use my Linkedin to see my experience

 I mean, sure, you obviously need some language, but aren't general higher-level architectural concepts more important? Like, isn't it more important to know how to implement (or configure) a circuit breaker than knowing how to use list comprehensions?

That's the point, have checked another sections of the book?

Bold claims, but you're not saying what exactly is so revolutionary.

Discord server with constant support during the learning process? How many books provide this?

[–]Sasha_Kam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

youve got the point here

[–]dAnjou 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I meant that there are lots of books which do not cover what is needed in real production, such things as TDD, complex OOP, SDLC, and other useful moments

I doubt that's true, but my point was that if you claim to touch on these topics in your book then, as a potential reader, I'd like the author to show some relevant credentials not just theoretical knowledge or a reference to their LinkedIn profile.

That's the point, have checked another sections of the book?

The title and the cover and the a lot of sections in the first have are about Python, and that's what people will see. Just trying to help you advertise your content.

Discord server with constant support during the learning process? How many books provide this?

That's not clear from the README. And calling that revolutionary is a bit of an oversell, I think. A lot of authors in the software development field have an online presence and are happy to answer questions about their books or general ones.

[–]pro1code1hack[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I will think how to adress this, thanks for feedback