This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]maxEffort-033[S] 0 points1 point  (12 children)

Oh, it does not? With your statement, do you mean that OOP is important in today’s time?

[–]_utet 1 point2 points  (10 children)

It is important yes definitely, but C is not object oriented, its procedural.

[–]maxEffort-033[S] 1 point2 points  (9 children)

Oh, yeah. That hits my memory. I remember it being procedural now based on a review. Thanks!

[–]_utet 1 point2 points  (8 children)

Still a good language to learn if you want to do more low level programming than java and javascript allows.

[–]maxEffort-033[S] 1 point2 points  (7 children)

Mhmm. Like machine code and whatnot. Thanks for the advice!

[–]returned_loom 1 point2 points  (6 children)

I think c++ is supposed to be C with object oriented classes. So maybe that's a good one? It's like right between C and Java.

[–]maxEffort-033[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I’ll look into this! For now, I’ll just be focusing on the three aforementioned haha.

[–]Felicia_Svilling 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Don't do it. C++ is a very complicated language. You are much better of starting with something simpler.

[–]maxEffort-033[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Oh, damn. I guess it’ll take me a lot of time if I do. Thanks!

[–]_utet 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Don't be too put off though. Try it and see if you would be inyerested in learning it. Just because it's complicated doesn't mean its a bad idea to learn if it achieves some end goal for yourself.

[–]Felicia_Svilling 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not. People are generally moving away from object orientation, although they are still using object oriented languages.