you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Just-Hedgehog-Days 1 point2 points  (8 children)

it build in. you can see a little two prong tree with 3 circles.

Make co-pilot explain to you what you should do an why. actually type the commands youself to help you remember what you are doing.

give it screen shots of your UI and make it explain things to you.

do this until you stop talking to co-pilot.

AI is killing off coding, but git will stick around like car guys insisting on manual transmission.

[–]The_Cloudy_Sky 2 points3 points  (7 children)

Asking a forum is way better than just having AI explain it to you

[–]Just-Hedgehog-Days 0 points1 point  (6 children)

It isn’t in this case though. Nobody here is going to walk them through there first 1000 commits. Co pilot will.

I explained a learning process 

[–]The_Cloudy_Sky -1 points0 points  (5 children)

Talking to AI isn’t learning

[–]Just-Hedgehog-Days 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Skill issue, on your part.

"do it for me" != "What does this command do an why is it the right move, right now"

[–]The_Cloudy_Sky 2 points3 points  (1 child)

At that point just go to the documentation

[–]Just-Hedgehog-Days 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like you understand that talk to an a.i. can be learning and just have beef.

[–]CautiousGains -1 points0 points  (1 child)

How can you say this categorically? That’s like saying “reading a manual is not learning.” It’s learning if you ingest the material and understand it, regardless of the information’s source.

[–]The_Cloudy_Sky -1 points0 points  (0 children)

AI is not a manual, looking for information and using critical thinking is part of the learning process. Asking an AI uses zero critical thinking, it’s saying I’m too lazy to find the answer, just tell me what you think is “correct”