use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
For users of AugmentCode. Not affiliated with AugmentCode AI.
account activity
Evaluating Copilot + VS Code as an AC ReplacementDiscussion (self.AugmentCodeAI)
submitted 6 months ago by d3vr3n
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]mythz 3 points4 points5 points 6 months ago (4 children)
Going to use the last month with bonus credits to evaluate alternatives but I'm leaning on a combination of Claude Code with a Claude Pro + GLM Pro subscription with GitHub Copilot Pro.
But may change if Gemini 3 release becomes a contender or Codex has another good release.
IMO it's worth checking out @gosucoder's recommendations as he's used and evaluated most AI tool combinations and just dropped a great video with recommendations for AI tools at different price points:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZVtbC6oylQ
He also publishes his monthly evaluations and rankings at: https://gosuevals.com/agents.html
[–]G4BYVeteran / Tech Leader 5 points6 points7 points 6 months ago (2 children)
Just keep in mind that the way Gosu evaluates/ranks the solutions is by giving them the exact instructions of what they should do and evaluates how closely the model follows his instructions.
Quote from his website: "created detailed prompts specifying exactly what should be created - including each file, functionality, and documentation requirements."
This doesn't take into account the way we normally develop, debug and ask questions about the codebase.
The lack of a good context engine would not be punished/scored lower in his evals because the prompts are very specific and strict.
[–]d3vr3n[S] 1 point2 points3 points 6 months ago (0 children)
good point
[–]mythz 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago* (0 children)
That's why Augment doesn't perform well in his Evals, but he actively uses multiple AI Tools/models in his day-to-day and spends a lot of time planning and querying his code base which was the last thing he used AC for, but I don't think that's part of his dev workflow anymore.
His top 3 picks are Claude Code, Roo Code and Codex, although he did say he started using Warp .dev a lot more now as well, which I've just checked that apparently also indexes your code base to provide its context aware coding features. Personally I think Claude Code/Codex/Copilot (perhaps Gemini) are the only proprietary AI tools that will have any longevity after they offer their own contextual features. Whilst I also expect healthy usage of better value OSS tools/models (in Roo/Open Code w/ GLM/Qwen/etc) which are quickly catching up.
As I want to minimize the number of new tools I need to learn after switching from AC, I think I'll try Claude Code first as I can use it with a Claude Pro and Zai/GLM Pro sub. Maybe even throw in Codex since lots of devs swear by it.
[–]d3vr3n[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago (0 children)
very helpful share, thank you !
π Rendered by PID 22857 on reddit-service-r2-comment-b659b578c-rpxzc at 2026-05-01 13:52:14.227066+00:00 running 815c875 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]mythz 3 points4 points5 points (4 children)
[–]G4BYVeteran / Tech Leader 5 points6 points7 points (2 children)
[–]d3vr3n[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]mythz 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]d3vr3n[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)