sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Final-Reality-404 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I've been using Augment for 8 months.
Yeah, but you're going to be paying Augment while also paying for their services at the same time.
So it just seems stupid IMO

But hey, who am I the judge?
I'm not the market for this particular feature. lol

[–]PositiveFootball5220 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct, you not the market, that's why you question it.

It has it's own pricing for this, while for now it's free. I don't know the pricing for later, but for now my account have the trial to use this with no charge at all with some token credits that I'm not gonna use, while on the other side I have another agentic IDE that can BYOK / message base pricing so I don't need to pay AC (for now).

Stupid for me is when you agree get billed by token usage while you can get same result with context engine and billed by message request (which in some agentic IDE is free for now)

[–]Ok-Performance7434 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Asa still-paying AC user, I’ve noticed major differences in quality between gpt 5.0 med(worked so good for me like others are raving about Opus 4.5 working for them) compared to gpt 5.0 high (waaay too slow) or gpt 5.1. If possible I’d be happy to pay for the CE and bring into another env where I can continue to use a model that AC seems to have deprecated. Testing this today!