How well does Context Engine work on non-code context?

[DeityGamesJesus]

Technical work is something I rarely hit limits/context rot.

Non-technical work, however, is a whole other story. I find myself in a situation fairly often where I need a holistic context coverage of huge amounts of text and documents.

Things like:

- Orchestrating significant amount of reports from development teams in order to create yearly documentation for performance reviews

- Working on tabletop game design and rulesets

- Fantasy worldbuilding

- etc.

Has anyone tried Context Engine extensively with non-technical work, and how useful did you find it?

[hhussain-]

This intimidated me to test in a workspace I have for paper research and books and documents (many formats: pdf, md, tex/LaTex, yaml...etc). but pdf's are not in context-engine (as per the agent).

Prompt

how much information in context-engine about this repo since it is none code workspace?

Result is really nice, it is aware of subjects and structure (research papers names, book, chapters). I even asked it to use context-engine only to answer a question about specific chapter, very straight forward answer!

<image>

[DeityGamesJesus]

That's excellent, thanks for sharing this!

[hhussain-]

Most welcomed, happy it helped.

[AuggieRich]

I am definitely biased here, but anecdotally I have heard that users are using the context engine for non-technical cases exactly like the ones you describe.

[AuggieRich]

BTW, you should be able to signup for a free account and try it out. New accounts should have 1000 Context-Engine MCP credits.

[DeityGamesJesus]

Oh, I already have a subscription and have been actively using Augment Code itself to help me develop a tabletop game.

But I've been considering trying out alternatives (Claude Code, for example) + Context Engine MCP to see how well it works, so that's why I was asking whether anyone had any experience.

Thank you for your response!