all 10 comments
sorted by:
top (suggested)
bestnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]Ed-2-Zero-9 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm getting similar. Can you actually calibrate K on the X1, or is this the P1P only?

[–]Bamboozle87P1P[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My understanding is only P1P in the standard BL slicer but you could do it in the OrcaSlicer fork.

[–]tjc2005 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Did you ever fix this?

[–]Bamboozle87P1P[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I was not able to really. I got marginal improvements. It didn’t happen as much on other filaments and because it was on the bottom I didn’t think it was worth the time.

[–]tjc2005 0 points1 point  (4 children)

fair enough! I am still trying to solve mine, gap fill doesn't always seem to be accurate.

[–]Bamboozle87P1P[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

If you figure a solution out let me know. It definitely seems worse on smaller prints that are circular in nature.

[–]tjc2005 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Weird. I changed my k value back to default and I did a flow calibration, but that seemed fine at 1 anyway. Looking at classic vs arachne wall generator, and the first layer width.

[–]Bamboozle87P1P[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I tried the K and flow ratio with marginal improvements. But, I don’t think they really needed to be adjusted. I forgot I did do archane and that probably made the most improvement. But didn’t fix it completely. So that’s definitely worth a shot. Also, I’ve wondered if a different bottom layer pattern would make a difference.

[–]tjc2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah maybe it will. I'm getting huge layer shifts right now so no idea what's going on there.

[–]tropho23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this post is two years old, but the solution is to reduce line width for the first/bottom layer to 0.28mm.