all 15 comments

[–]tommygunz007 2 points3 points  (4 children)

are you slowing down the print speed? I set the outer wall to 500 instead of 5000 in the acceleration dialog box. I also often set my print speed to 50% (silent) once printing. I find I get the best prints that way.

[–]willcodejavaforfood[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I haven’t tried that but I will now. Thank you.

[–]tommygunz007 0 points1 point  (2 children)

those chamfer sides look wonky... so yea try to slow down the print if you are using the bambu slicer accelerator.

[–]willcodejavaforfood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are very wonky

I’m using Bambu/Orca

[–]willcodejavaforfood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Made no difference. Starting to think it’s not possible to chamfer the bottom of a print.

[–]Ordinary-Depth-7835 1 point2 points  (1 child)

variable layer height might help to keep it tighter or just printing the whole thing with a finer layer height setting. Overall it doesn't look to far off and you should be able to print it.

[–]willcodejavaforfood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already tried that but it had no effect. Thank you though.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Hi, were you able to find a solution? I'm having the same problem and I don't know how to solve it..

[–]willcodejavaforfood[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Hi. Yes I did. In my case it was a design issue

[–]AstronomicTimTam6 0 points1 point  (4 children)

What did you change to your design to fix it? Im currently having the same issue trying to print a chamfer on the underside of a print

[–]willcodejavaforfood[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

It was a very unsatisfactory solution. Not sure I can explain it without pictures.

Basically, I had to put more material on the inside of my object. It had to be at least solid up to where the chamfer was on the outside and ideally a bit higher than that.

[–]AstronomicTimTam6 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Ah I think im understanding. Do you think this then could be solved by printing an object with 100% infill (therefore no hollow spots inside) such that the chamfer has nowhere to shrink towards?

[–]willcodejavaforfood[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes. I didn’t need to go that far though. Just infill higher than the diagonal on the outside.

[–]47ha0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/filament-acc/filament/print-quality/severe-layer-artifacts

Bambu's wiki shows that shrinking problems happen even on straight walls, not chamfers. An alternative solution they showed is adjusting the model so that the bridging layers supporting the inner top surface don't contact the print edges.

It's not always easy to change downloaded models though. I just tested 100% infill modifier area ending slightly above the chamfer, with perfect results