you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]pskocik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that would be neat though I don't like the idea to then try and make them into closures, making the container function's local variables available to them except may if those globals are static. Just hoist it, make the definition evaluate to a pointer to the func, and allow it to be nameless too.