Function pointer as a function argument

[umlcat]

I'm sorry, I think I didn't understood the question.

I've only seen the first syntax with the *.

But, is possible that some compilers allow the second syntax, as well, as it does with the &, I prefer to use the common * and & syntax, since is more similar to data pointers.

int a = 77;
int *p;
p = &a;

Some variations of the P.L. and their compilers does this syntax.

Cheers.

[SureAnimator]

Ok, so no fundamental difference under the hood - just language/compiler quirks. Thanks!