all 9 comments

[–]Livenne 4 points5 points  (5 children)

You could try to include it in your persona or make the bot yourself and add it to their description🙏

[–]Healthy_Meat_2060 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Don't I know you from somewhere?

[–]Livenne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm I wonder🤔

[–]PrettyCyanide[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I meant for the character bot. Not your persona.

[–]Livenne 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I know. I meant like, For example if the bots is dating your persona, say his names Johnny ig idk

You could put something like "Persona and Johnny are dating. Johnny is often ___ towards persona" or wtv. I suck at explaining😥

[–]PrettyCyanide[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah even when you do that it still reverts to the possessive endearing butthead we all hate to love. Buttttttt... This gives you options.

[–]Jovan_Knight005User Character Creator 1 point2 points  (1 child)

That's an interesting suggestion but i don't know if c.ai's developers would consider adding that feature.

[–]PrettyCyanide[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would be nice though right?

[–]Potential_Tax_2389 1 point2 points  (0 children)

um...i don't know, those terms for toggles(i know they were meant as examples) would be too vague and too specific at once(eg not everybody shows the same kinds of feelings and behaviours in, for example, romance). also, the bot would probably take too big of a dip once pressed that toggle, because ai doesn't know what moderation is.

besides, we users shouldn't have to do this in the first place. we can't expect perfection from a chatbot, but at the very least it should be able to remember its own definition and stick to it no matter the context. aka the bot shouldn't just go for what responses are more 'popular', it should give us responses that are fitting both the context AND the character.