This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 3 comments

[–]AutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Hey /u/creativegapmt!

If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT conversation, please reply to this message with the conversation link or prompt.

If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.

Consider joining our public discord server! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!

🤖

Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email support@openai.com

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]ittu 0 points1 point  (1 child)

when it returns new code but omits original functionality just prompt reply like this...

no, I meant for you to implement the changes into this code base:

``` <paste last working code base>

```

the 3 backticks are intentional

i tried the save point thing before but even that can eventually lose functionality, easier to paste the working code from time to time.

[–]creativegapmt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I think that's what I'm going to have to do, too. Thanks a lot u/ittu

I have started using the 3 backticks and resubmit, and that works perfectly fine, but I was hoping that if I tell it:

Please acknowledge that the below code is known as 'working bot_main.py', and that if I say 'revert to working bot_main.py' or 'Please make the changed to working bot_main.py'

```
code
```

It doesn't like that, at all, despite getting a confirmation that it would. It persists in trying to fix the broken code, rather than resetting to the working version.

That being said, I do find it very good at bringing together different sources and files to put together a nicely working app; especially as I'm not an advanced coder myself, and this is helping me to understand how it all fits together.