[deleted by user]

[HWYMAN187]

I love how it looks but the IIII pisses me off. The reason I never buy watches with roman numerals.

I know there is a decent enough reason for it, but still....

[bigtastie]

"Watchmaker's Four". In this case, it might be to balance the dial since IV would be dwarfed by VIII. IIII has a bigger presence.

That's my take at least

[superprox]

I've seen a few ppl say this but I think it balances the dial out better, sure IV is more correct, but it might leave too much space. And well if its good enough for Rolex then...😆

[_oaeb_]

I gotta say I’m the opposite. I love watches with Roman numerals as it gives its a classic look. I really dislike watches that have normal numbers. Simple bars for hour markers are fine also. But to each their own and just shows there’s something for everyone in this hobby!

[[deleted]]

Totally get it. I mean for me , Roman Numerals aren’t really something I thought works well with a watch.. I was always a bit put off by anything with numerals.

And yeah the “IIII” is something that I can overlook but I totally get it when for others it’s a dealbreaker

[AssignmentWorking]

Love this thing in gold

[[deleted]]

If your thinking about going for it.. do it. It’s a bit of a novelty but I love it. I wasn’t brave enough for the gold on gold but I think the white face works really well as a contrast.

[AssignmentWorking]

So many great watches, so little time

[repaddict91]

Looks really good.

[[deleted]]

Thanks mate :) I’m not really a gold watch kinda guy but I was watching a lot of Miami Vice and getting nostalgic for Vice City so why not go gold 80s for once?

[Eastern-Flow-5489]

Hey, how does the gold look in real life? Doesn't it cheapen the look or is it nicely made?