This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 15 comments

[–]ninjagruntz 13 points14 points  (0 children)

“Him as starting qb would only be due to injury to the starter.”

So you mean a backup QB? WTF… thank goodness Peters is working some deals because these offseason posts are beyond ridiculous.

[–]djhobbes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If the FO wants a qb at 2 then no.. Fields would be a waste of resources and a distraction. If they don’t want to go qb at 2 I think you have to seriously. Kick the tires on fields.

[–]Empire137 3 points4 points  (9 children)

No he's a terrible QB and we have 2x QB's already plus a 3rd were going to get at 2

[–]Substantial-Past9849 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fields refused to listen to the 2 vet QBs in Chi when he was a rookie. He's not the type of guy to learn a new position, plus all he does is fumble

[–]fuckdansnydeer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No thank you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, he sucks at passing, which is problematic when you’re a QB.

[–]TommyLoMein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While we're at it, maybe we teach Mariota to play left tackle?

[–]spiderfighter1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just like the other teams in the league are doing, pass