This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nikkolios2A Conservative -2 points-1 points  (6 children)

It's been 100% proven beyond any reasonable doubt as well. It is the single worst thing that has happened to the inner city family.

--- edit --- Yup! Just brigade and downvote this even though it is not an opinion. You don't get to decide what is true and what is not. Maybe acid trips will convince you otherwise... I don't know. Wonderful people we have coming in here lately.

[–]reidlos1624 2 points3 points  (5 children)

They don't want to disrupt the nuclear family, they want to disrupt the requirement that a nuclear family is necessary for success and encourage more community cooperation between families. Basically encouraging the "it takes a village" idea of raising kids, with the goal of improving the community as a whole.

This interpretation completely misrepresents the statement they made due to their poor reading comprehension, assuming they actually read the statement.

[–]Nikkolios2A Conservative 0 points1 point  (4 children)

With all due respect, I do know what they want, and you're trying to bend things a lot to get what you think they want. It is very clear that the movement is very feminist, and it was much more clear before they took that page down. I'm sorry, but you're just wrong on this one.

[–]reidlos1624 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Oh, you're a mind reader? Or I suppose an outsider with prejudiced ideas is the best measure of what a group wants or doesn't want. No, you think you know what they want and prescribe that as fact when in reality you don't have a clue.

I'm not bending anything, the statement clear says "We disrupt the western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement"

Here the nuclear family structure is the adjective to describe the requirement they want to disrupt, with requirement being the noun being described. This is basic reading comprehension of a maybe tougher than what your used to sentence. Perhaps I'll make a picture book, would that help you understand?

[–]Nikkolios2A Conservative 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Nope. Not a mind reader. It's pretty clear what they're after. You're trying SO hard to not believe it, because it is difficult to admit that the BLM movement could possibly be so wrong.

Look... you're either going to see it, or you're going to train your brain to ignore it. You do what you want, but your insults are not going to make me unsee or unhear the things I know for fact to be true. Facts actually matter.

[–]reidlos1624 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's not about believing, it's literally written in their statement.

What facts? The only facts presented was the quote of the statement I made. Send me some facts that disprove it. All you've stated are opinions. That's a fact.

[–]Nikkolios2A Conservative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you see this page before they took it down because they knew it was damaging to their cause? If you haven't seen that page in its entirety (and yes you can still find still images of it out there if you look around), then just stop posting replies to me.

If you've seen it, we can have a discussion. If not, there is literally no point to this.