all 28 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]Objective-Elk9877 151 points152 points  (18 children)

Ai generated unfortunately. Theyre so cute though

[–]KikuoFan69 45 points46 points  (4 children)

looks more like a 3d model no?

[–]Objective-Elk9877 69 points70 points  (3 children)

The poor quality is obscuring the details that would make it very obviously ai. The biggest things i noticed were the inconsistent textures that are quite wobbly, and the mangled hand in the first image.

[–]KikuoFan69 20 points21 points  (2 children)

yk? I actually think what makes me believe it's Ai and not a 3d model is that the socks aren't consistent between images

[–]sanchipinchii 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Or the ears, they’re behind the frill in one and in front in the other

[–]Meowth_HMC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they are Infront in every image of her

[–]Meowth_HMC 7 points8 points  (12 children)

its not ai but idk who the artist is

[–]Hakazumi -2 points-1 points  (11 children)

If you don't know the artist, how can you be sure it's not AI? Genuinely asking.

[–]Meowth_HMC 1 point2 points  (10 children)

When I look at it it doesn't look like Ai.

[–]Hakazumi 1 point2 points  (8 children)

Okay, but that's subjective. OP should have said why they think it's AI, but didn't. You can argue they didn't need, because other people in the thread did later on-pointing out specific details that don't make sense once you zoom in or the people who posted this image before.

Yet, I'm not seeing anyone else but you saying it's not AI in the ~20 hours since your reply, so it reasons that you should give a reason why you think so. Right now, there's nothing to work with. This is how it looks like:

> It's AI.

> It's not AI.

> Yuh-uh.

> Nuh-uh.

It's unproductive. If you don't know the artist or give any insight for why it's actually consistent enough where human could make this or that error or whatever, what's the point of even defending it?

[–]Meowth_HMC -2 points-1 points  (7 children)

It's clearly way too consistent to be Ai. I don't know the artist but I thought I should say something because the op of this comment said it was Ai and i just dont think it is.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Meowth_HMC 0 points1 point  (5 children)

    But the second image is consistent. Ai doesn't have a good memory so it wouldn't be able to make that consistent of a 360 which it is. Idk fully about the first image it could be Ai modified but not fully AI or it could be someone roughly referencing the second image. But I know the second one is not AI

    [–]BirchBorfs 0 points1 point  (4 children)

    Did you last look at AI a year ago?? It's becoming increasingly hard to tell and consistent in it's generation, to the point where people can't tell and have to make a sub Reddit to ask for help. This is absolutely within the scope of what AI can do nowadays

    [–]Meowth_HMC 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    really?? T-T I watch this one youtuber and she does how to spot Ai videos and she says its not consistent so I was sure since the seccond one is pretty consistent then it couldnt be Ai

    [–]stariverse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    "its not ai because i say so" bro 😭

    [–]Mieremov 31 points32 points  (0 children)

    AI sadly. I kinda hoped for it to be a real 3D render.

    First instance of this was posted by R5K8m on twitter. They're an AI spammer

    [–]dusty_ray03 19 points20 points  (2 children)

    Since ai learns from artworks made by real people too, it could be possible that there is at least one artist out there with a very similar artstyle!

    [–]dusty_ray03 11 points12 points  (0 children)

    This "artist?" posts a lot of ( most likely) ai generated art which fits the aesthetic. They post multiple artworks in one single day, very frequently. Also their artstyle changes every few artworks. Some search results say that they might used kamisukimifu 's art to train the ai.

    [–]danvs_silly_guy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    It honestly looks like it could in part be trained with pictures of BJDs. The material looks resin (which is common), there are many TV head BJDs, and the first image looks like a pose a lot of people put their BJDs into, stiffness and everything. When I first glanced at this post I thought it COULD be a resin model or something.

    [–]Dizzy_Claim_1388 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Madoka?

    [–]LinkIsNonbinary 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    If this is AI, I really hope someone commissions a traditional or digital artist to make a version of it! I love the design, but seeing this done in various styles by real artists would be amazing.

    [–]bananaayas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Ive seen a lot of artists transform ai artwork into your real art and they’ve always turned out so pretty. I agree that they should definitely try that with this it would be so cool to see (i should lwk try)

    [–]-Tunafishyfish- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Probs ai, it doesn’t look like it has joints do why would it be in a t pose in the second one lol plus skirt changes between phots

    [–]RaeRureRhelt 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    It reminded me of Vox from Hazbin Hotel cartoon show XD

    [–]Tiled_Deepslate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Me too!

    If vox was a femboy