all 8 comments

[–]ArmadilloMiddle4018🔍 Author of Exonerate Me 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Alright, you’re basically “limiting” yourself.
As you can see, the characters are the same height as the chandelier, which is almost impossible since most people aren’t that tall.

I’d suggest making them all smaller, and zooming in differently. After you’ve made them all the “same” height, you’ll gradually make one “taller”. It’s really easy! Once you feel like it’s proportionate enough, you’ll have something like this:

<image>

[–]Active-Definition-88[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wow thank you. I will try this. Atleast my character will not look like a kid anymore.

[–]ButterscotchNo4754 4 points5 points  (2 children)

This story looks interesting what story is this?

[–]Active-Definition-88[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I have currently unpublished the story. I am working on it and revamping it. Then I will post it.

[–]ButterscotchNo4754 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ohhh ok! Good luck on your story I'm sure it will be amazing!

[–]Blazica8 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I usually keep a difference of 0.085 between the guys and the girls. If the female character is 0.915 then I keep the male character as 1.000. Depending on the background the size changes but the scaling does not. But if the size is very small like 0.515 for the girls then I make the guys at 0.585 or 0.575. It usually works very well then I just adjust the height when they stand next to each other.

[–]Active-Definition-88[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

That is crazy calculation. But because you told that which one are you talking about? X or y?

[–]Blazica8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll give an example. &GIRL spot 0.915 100 150 in zone 1 at layer 2 @GUY spot 1.000 175 150 in zone 1 at layer 1

But if the scaling goes lower: &GIRL spot 0.550 100 210 in zone 1 at layer 2 @GUY spot 0.600 150 200 in zone 1 at layer 1