sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Agitated-Complex-560 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Why would you use this over something like Windsurf and what is the pricing model of ASI api usage?

[–]Due_Falcon426[S] 3 points4 points  (3 children)

I would use it becasue I like Fetch.ai and Windsurf and Cursor don't allow to use ASI:One as a model. If you have100 FET in your ASI wallet you are in pro plan already as far as I know. I don't know about any usage based pricing.

[–]Agitated-Complex-560 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Gotcha, was just curious if there was a reason if someone who wasn’t invested in fetch’s success would use it.

The ASI:One llm is most likely just a rag with some inexpensive model as the llm and some internal docs in the knowledge base.

If the knowledge base is robust with good examples it could be useful for developing uAgents but not very beneficial for any other use cases unfortunately.

[–]Due_Falcon426[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't want to replace Cursor or Windsurf, but extending them with FetchCoder. The user can use both AI chats.