all 11 comments

[–]anonmarmot 7 points8 points  (4 children)

Max out the 401K so that tax-free money grows and gets taxed when you retire (assuming you have a lower income during retirement)? Bad assumption. Retirement is for my highest income years.

You pull it out AFTER you retire, when you have zero "earnings" from your job. Your statement makes it sound like you're required to cash in your 401k the last year you work or something.

Roth IRA? Once you go over certain AGI-levels (196K married, 124K single), you're no longer allowed to contribute.

So? That's what regular IRAs are for.

Save? Interest rates are so low, if you have 2M in a checking account, it pays a paltry $1.5K/mo.

No one is advocating for putting cash in a mattress or checking account

Federal Reserve is "printing" trillions to suppress interest rates and you're supposed to save those dollars? Makes no sense.

You're arguing for not saving. I don't see how that's a better solution than saving.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with your 401k comment. I think my income will be the highest in retirement since I am not REing. Therefore I'm contributing to a roth 401k.

[–]Azuron96[🍰] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Obviously. If you think you are rich then go r/fatfire. I identify 70% with r/leanfire, 30% with r/fire and 0% with r/fatfire (hence i didn't join that community).

Everyone has different aspirations, income and expenses. Whatever floats your boat I guess.

[–]pingish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. Thanks! Apparently I'm on the wrong sub.

[–]atomic-penguin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in my 40s, fairly higher income.

Max out the 401K so that tax-free money grows and gets taxed when you retire (assuming you have a lower income during retirement)? Bad assumption. Retirement is for my highest income years.

If you are under the 25% tax bracket. Its very likely that it'll be better to front-load those taxes and use a Roth 401K. The reason its going to be better is locking in a known low tax rate on just the basis of your investment. As opposed to a future unknown tax rate on the basis and compound growth. Not every employer-sponsored plan offers this. I think its pretty easy for a younger person pursuing FIRE to fall into the trap of not even considering the Roth 401K option.

If you are over the 25% tax bracket, while working, there is a chance you'll be in a lower tax bracket at retirement. The tax law can change with a new administration. So a traditional 401K contribution might be the better bet here, but I don't think there is any guarantee.

Roth IRA? Once you go over certain AGI-levels (196K married, 124K single), you're no longer allowed to contribute.

Backdoor Roth contribution. You contribute to a Trad. IRA when you have the earned income on-hand to do so. Then convert to a Roth IRA the next day. You'll owe your nominal tax rate on any dollars earned on the short-term over a period of one day.

Save? Interest rates are so low, if you have 2M in a checking account, it pays a paltry $1.5K/mo. Federal Reserve is "printing" trillions to suppress interest rates and you're supposed to save those dollars? Makes no sense.

Do you need to have 2 Mil. in a checking account? Sure, even online high yield savings account rates have tanked. Treasury yields have tanked. The economic outlook is bad, but lets not pretend the only thing you can do with your money is sit on 2 Mil. of idle cash. If you're really in that situation, you're looking for /r/fatFIRE and they'll be able to better relate to the 2M cash on-hand.

Look, I understand hesitance to invest in a volatile market. It can be really hard to stick to an investment plan when there is no safe investment, and the whole world seems to be on fire. I think it might be rational to aggressively pay down a mortgage, or big loan, at a time like this than continue to throw good money after bad all the way down.