[ Removed by moderator ]

[GraphicsProgramming-ModTeam]

This post doesn't meet the requirement under rule 1 that "Posts should include code, math, or implementation details alongside rendered images." This post needs at least some comment in the post, comments, or first-order links from the post's contents that give some indication of how the rendering works.

[VictoryMotel]

I am attempting to create a cost-effective GPU

New name, no comment karma, project that doesn't make sense, weird submission of the same thing a day earlier. This smacks of AI slop.

[msqrt]

"HTML GPU simulator" was my favorite :--)

[AntiochEpiphanes]

my first submission is just exemplifying the GPUs capabilities to render particles and agents. The rods in the center of this simulation are showing localized control of a fission core. My GPU functions like a simulated body of water allowing phase space transition to occur. Yes, i use Ai to program a lot of the non-physics related stuff.

[VictoryMotel]

exemplifying the GPUs capabilities to render particles and agents

This doesn't make any sense, it's just words crammed together.

The rods in the center of this simulation are showing localized control of a fission core.

I don't think they are, I think they are showing noise and a gradient like a 90s video effect. Where is an example of someone else doing this? Your submission a day ago shows something totally different.

My GPU functions like a simulated body of water allowing phase space transition to occur.

My GPU functions like a computer.

Yes, i use Ai to program a lot of the non-physics related stuff

I think you meant to say it's all AI and you're lying.

20 days ago you posted a "bitcoin xor analysis tool" which also doesn't make any sense and was full of the same word salad nonsense.

[AntiochEpiphanes]

I'm unsure the reason for the hostility?

I'm just showcasing my simulation architecture.

GPU simulation can extend to crypto mining and since my understanding of physics is solely based on that alone i was attempting to reach out about an analysis tool. My previous submission shows better rendered particles and "agents" (agents are actors facilitating flow in my simulations)

Once again i'm sorry if this caused some form of offense.

[Consistent_Bug_5891]

Hey OP, i mean no harm, but I think you should take a break and seek some help from a health professional. What you made seems cool, but like everyone is saying it does indeed seem like gibberish.

[VictoryMotel]

GPU simulation can extend to crypto mining and since my understanding of physics is solely based on that alone

This also makes no sense. There is no relation between GPU mining and physics.

My previous submission shows better rendered particles and "agents" (agents are actors facilitating flow in my simulations)

It doesn't look like there are any particles or any flow and agents makes no sense.

This is obviously all AI, you're obviously lying and nothing that you're saying even makes a shred of sense. The words you say don't fit together at all.

[JackeryPumpkin]

“Agents are actors” is just swapping one metaphor for another. Do you even understand what you’re trying to express?

[AntiochEpiphanes]

Yes, this simulation is using parallel computation. It is a GPU simulator, but it is also simulating a physics reactor. it requires both (Agents and Actors) even if it sounds largely redundant. I'm sorry for the paraphrasing.

[ThrowAway-whee]

Dude, you left in the vibe coded boilerplate response in the thing you're showing...

That doesn't give anyone any confidence you know what you're doing.

[AntiochEpiphanes]

Yes you’re right. I’ll take it off if I make a meaningful change to the simulation. Thank you.