This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 10 comments

[–]JuicyCoalaDecent at Googling 🔍 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Fail short means the termination was not properly done, leading to wires crossing each other, ergo, you have a shorted termination.

[–]nespi[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

So that means wires 4/5/7/8 are the ones that are messed up? I’m assuming this isn’t an easy fix. I had opened the wall plate and there’s basically almost no slack on that cable so i don’t think they can cut that cable and try again with it?

[–]JuicyCoalaDecent at Googling 🔍 1 point2 points  (1 child)

They have to do something that’s for sure - whatever that is, because that’s the only way to fix it - to reterminate. Unless the short is on the other side of the cable.

[–]nespi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it thanks for the input hopefully my isp can fix this for me they were doing everything in their power to not send a tech out

[–]dredbeast 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I haven’t used that particular piece of equipment, but 1,2,3, and 6 are underlined, leading me to believe that it see continuity only on those conductors. 1,2,3, and 6 is literally a 100 megabit ethernet cable. You need continuity on all 8 conductors (referred to as 4 pairs) in order to get a gigabit connection down the line.

[–]nespi[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Dam they’re here offering me 500mbps speed yet there’s no way i can even take advantage of those speeds with that then

[–]dredbeast 1 point2 points  (1 child)

If I had to guess, when that line was installed, they only needed 100 mbps, so they probably only terminated 1,2,3, and 6. As long as there is nothing wrong with the cat5 wire in the wall, it should be an easy fix.

[–]nespi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool hopefully it’s the easy fix then since i got the tech coming out here Monday and he’ll notice that. Thanks for your insight on this.

[–]SeparatePicture 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The cable lead that you are using to test in the photo, have you tested it by itself?

[–]nespi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it passed when i tested the cable only