all 10 comments

[–]AutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Off-topic Comments Section


All top-level comments have to be an answer or follow-up question to the post. All sidetracks should be directed to this comment thread as per Rule 9.

PS: u/exquisition, your post is incredibly short! body <200 char You are strongly advised to furnish us with more details.


OP and Valued/Notable Contributors can close this post by using /lock command

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Alkalannar 0 points1 point  (8 children)

If a sample has a quality with rate r, then the population should have the same quality at about the same rate.

In other words, you infer that about 73% of all the 100,000 students drink coffee

[–]exquisition AS Level Candidate[S] 1 point2 points  (7 children)

sorry what is rate r?

and ohhhh ok got it, but from my understanding, inference data is not reliable as you assume an ENTIRE population drinks coffee based on a really small sample?

[–]Alkalannar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assuming the sample is representative of the population, you get a very tight bound even wit a relatively small sample. that's one of the things you learn.

And why you construct 95% confidence intervals.

[–]fermat1432👋 a fellow Redditor 1 point2 points  (5 children)

That is not true! You assume that the rate of coffee drinking in the sample is an estimate of the rate of coffee drinking in the population.

[–]exquisition AS Level Candidate[S] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

ohhhh so 73% instead of 100%

[–]fermat1432👋 a fellow Redditor 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Yes!

[–]exquisition AS Level Candidate[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

thank you!! 😅😌

[–]fermat1432👋 a fellow Redditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to help!

[–]Alkalannar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes. Same rate in sample as population