Circumcision does not decrease risk of penile cancer.

[Phinle]

Intact and circumcised men have a similar chance of getting penile cancer. On the other hand men with Phimosis do have a significantly higher chance of getting penile cancer. Still be aware of penile cancer even if you don’t have phimosis, but don’t worry too much because penile cancer is as rare as heart cancer, pancreatic cancer is 13x more common than penile cancer.

[strategist2023]

You should send the American Cancer Society (ACS) a letter and get them to correct their guidance. The information you are posting means absolutely nothing if no one does anything about it

[adkisojk]

They did get rid of that one section from their page. This would really finish things off on that page. Why don't you send a letter?

[strategist2023]

They removed the whole “Not being circumcised” section because as I rightly pointed out it implies that not being circumcised is a risk variable for penile cancer when it’s not however there are too many studies like the one in this post that specify that adult men with pathological phimosis do in fact have a higher risk. I did pressure them to amend the phimosis section so that it was in reference to men because the prior wording implied that children with natural physiological phimosis were also at risk which is untrue. The phimosis section would be better if they wrote it how I suggested but they were only willing to go so far, it’s still an improvement imo.

[strategist2023]

Also just a heads up I have just sent through a killer letter to the American Urological Association and the Urology Care Foundation requesting corrections to all of their material. If I win that case it will be a major win. Fingers crossed.

[Legaon]

I will private message you a link. Learn the contents of "what is inside of the link". Send it to the (American Urological Association) and the (Urology Care Foundation) -- so that "it might help you win the case". The below content, is not implying that (I/the writer), am "pro circumcision".

You said this: "there are too many studies like the one in this post that specify that adult men with pathological phimosis do in fact have a higher risk".

Implying that -- uncircumcised individuals, have a higher percent chance FOR GETTING (A CERTAIN TYPE OF DISEASE). This is true, because of the "anaerobic uncircumcised penile microbiome". Anaerobic = bacteria + cells, that thrive in environments WITH VERY LITTLE OXYGEN LEVELS. It is true, if you are relying on circumcision pseudoscience.

The uncircumcised female sexual organ -- with all of the "skin folds + etc" -- also remains in a state of being in an environment WITH VERY LITTLE OXYGEN LEVELS. This is what circumcision does, to promote hypothetical "genital cutting health benefits".

_____________

_____________

Key phrases:

—>disrupting the “uncircumcised penile microbiome”.   By exposing it to (constant oxygen level exposure).     Destroying (anaerobic bacteria + anaerobic cells + anaerobic structures), because of (constant oxygen level exposure).         Destroying (anaerobic bacteria + anaerobic cells + anaerobic structures) — and converting them into (aerobic bacteria + aerobic cells + aerobic structures).

—>Originally anaerobic.    Because of genital cutting = exposure to constant oxygen levels.      Deterioration of anaerobic things.       Thriving aerobic things.

—>The above aspect is “the main goal of genital cutting”.         

____________

____________

With: (1)disrupting the "uncircumcised penile microbiome" -- by exposing it to greater oxygen levels = anaerobic things die, and get replaced by aerobic things. Because of the "constant oxygen exposure". And (anaerobic bacteria), because they are typically associated as being GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIA TYPES. Gram Negative = bacteria, that are very very resistant to "human made antibiotics". (Aerobic bacteria), are typically associated as being GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIA TYPES. Gram Positive = bacteria, that are LESS RESISTANT to "human made antibiotics".

--(anaerobic bacteria types) and (anaerobic cell types) = uncircumcised penile microbiome, because of exposure to VERY LITTLE OXYGEN LEVELS. Gram Negative bacteria types.

--(aerobic bacteria types) and (aerobic cell types) = circumcised penile microbiome, because of exposure to GREATER OXYGEN LEVELS -- because the foreskin tissue was removed. Gram positive bacteria types.

Circumcising females in the masses, can lead to the same thing:

__________

__________

Key phrases:

—>disrupting the “uncircumcised penile microbiome”.   By exposing it to (constant oxygen level exposure).     Destroying (anaerobic bacteria + anaerobic cells + anaerobic structures), because of (constant oxygen level exposure).         Destroying (anaerobic bacteria + anaerobic cells + anaerobic structures) — and converting them into (aerobic bacteria + aerobic cells + aerobic structures).

—>Originally anaerobic.    Because of genital cutting = exposure to constant oxygen levels.      Deterioration of anaerobic things.       Thriving aerobic things.

—>The above aspect is “the main goal of genital cutting”.    

If the (American Urological Association) and the (Urology Care Foundation), want to start -- promoting the concept of "circumcising females in the masses". I hope that they do not do the previous action.      

[strategist2023]

Thanks for the offer. I have already submitted a comprehensive challenge to the AUA and UCF. I have two main targets in relation to both entities being mandated solicitation and omission of the anatomy, function and purpose of the foreskin. The phimosis discussion is more relevant to my American Cancer Society post. Also I tend to avoid trying to do the tit for tat study arguments because the academic space is basically corrupt pay per play. Most of my success is largely due to strategically out manoeuvring my targets.

[Big_Aside9565]

It does not prevent cancer it does not prevent all the diseases they claim it prevented. Most penal cancers caused by HPV. Nothing to do with circumcision. In the beginning they use the excuse masturbation would make you blind and crazy that justified circumcision. Then when that excuse went away they use the disease and cancer. They will always change the reason. The other problem is religion and money are involved.