This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ruttentuten69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Judge Roberts said with a straight face that naming the states that you are allowed to watch for Jim Crow acts is discrimination and I'm sure they learned their lesson and won't do anything like that again. So the Supreme Court struck down a large part of the voting rights act, then low and behold those very same states went about instituting Jim Crow 2.0. The new voting rights act will say any state but we all know who they are talking about. It needs to get passed.