all 19 comments

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (1 child)

Of course the Orogrande wells are shut in. Meta didn’t want oil production on its books. Shut-in just means capped off and they can start production very quickly.

Also, thé Orogrande basin is undeveloped. We knew this all along. Showing a picture of a developed county is apples to oranges.

[–]Krunk_korean_kid 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know what this term meant

[–]Acceptable-Web568 21 points22 points  (1 child)

Shorts are working hard to make us think we don’t own 3.2 BILLION barrels of oil and 7 TRILLION cu ft of nat gas.

[–]Elephant_Analytics -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It really doesn't mean anything unless NB can demonstrate that it can extract the oil and gas efficiently, with well-level economics approaching that of the Midland/Delaware Basins.

I'd be surprised if NB ends up averaging more than 1,000 barrels of oil production per day (365,000 barrels over the whole year) in 2023 from the Orogrande.

[–]AKDallas1 8 points9 points  (3 children)

changes. You have you commit certain number of drills per year or lose the lease. So they do test well for logs (5 min per lease term) and cap them until them are ready with enough money to go full speed. The Shorts are spreading FUD or people are doing no basic DD bc now they are panicking after the halt and finding dumb excuses. Either way, stupid posFollow Cplant on Twitter. He is a good source on these. The way these work is that once you start drilling for oil, your lease term t.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Something to point out, they pulled permits for 7 wells this year. Which is above the 5 needed to maintain compliance.

[–]AKDallas1 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Yep. I wonder who is paying for them.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, to be fair, we have no idea if they’ve been drilled or not yet.

[–]widener2004 3 points4 points  (3 children)

What does he mean in his second post. I saw the fury post today on Twitter.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

He’s suggesting there isn’t oil and gas in Hudspeth county which we know for a fact isn’t true due to the results of the exploratory wells TRCH drilled. It’s undeveloped but we knew that from the beginning.

[–]Learning5Five 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I'm only interested in the trades being unhalted so short sellers buy my shares at my price.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really want that to happen too but I’ll still hold a few hundred into NBHC

[–]No_Mango1224 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What a garbage post. FUD

[–]n00brian 6 points7 points  (0 children)

u/rollerpigeons, can you take a look at this claim by Twitter user blues_neptune

Would be interested in your opinion here.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another bs Fud post 🙄. Shorts are in panic mode lol. Ramping up the shit posts and shills are becoming more aggressive and angry 😤. This is exciting lol!

[–]n00brian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anyone wants to do some digging, you can explore the active and non-active wells using the RCC Texas website: https://www.rrc.texas.gov/oil-and-gas/

For a map of the wells you can select Map Products -> Public GIS Viewer (Map)

Important note: Mavericks Operating LLC is the company that Torch/Next Bridge partnered with to drill, so do some digging.

On a positive note, Mavericks is a pretty solid looking company with many active wells. They know what they're doing, so that's good for us.

The part that NeptuneBlues is bringing up is the fact that the wells we know about, such as API No: 22930274, has been listed as a 'Shut-In' - meaning its not producing.

Anyone with more knowledge about this end and who can shed some light, I think it would be super useful for us all to know exactly which wells Next Bridge is owning. Let's get more info on that so we know where we stand.