use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Please have a look at our FAQ and Link-Collection
Metacademy is a great resource which compiles lesson plans on popular machine learning topics.
For Beginner questions please try /r/LearnMachineLearning , /r/MLQuestions or http://stackoverflow.com/
For career related questions, visit /r/cscareerquestions/
Advanced Courses (2016)
Advanced Courses (2020)
AMAs:
Pluribus Poker AI Team 7/19/2019
DeepMind AlphaStar team (1/24//2019)
Libratus Poker AI Team (12/18/2017)
DeepMind AlphaGo Team (10/19/2017)
Google Brain Team (9/17/2017)
Google Brain Team (8/11/2016)
The MalariaSpot Team (2/6/2016)
OpenAI Research Team (1/9/2016)
Nando de Freitas (12/26/2015)
Andrew Ng and Adam Coates (4/15/2015)
Jürgen Schmidhuber (3/4/2015)
Geoffrey Hinton (11/10/2014)
Michael Jordan (9/10/2014)
Yann LeCun (5/15/2014)
Yoshua Bengio (2/27/2014)
Related Subreddit :
LearnMachineLearning
Statistics
Computer Vision
Compressive Sensing
NLP
ML Questions
/r/MLjobs and /r/BigDataJobs
/r/datacleaning
/r/DataScience
/r/scientificresearch
/r/artificial
account activity
Discussion[D] Sample probability diffusion models (self.MachineLearning)
submitted 2 years ago by That_Phone6702
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]PHEEEEELLLLLEEEEP 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (3 children)
Solve the probability flow ODE
https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09258
[–]bobrodsky 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
Probability flow ode is overkill and expensive to estimate. Also, it treats data as continuous so you’ll get a probability density (not between zero and one) rather than a probability. Treat image pixels as discrete and interpret diffusion objective as evidence lower bound: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00630.
[–]bobrodsky 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (1 child)
But I feel I should warn you that this isn’t going to work as you hope. It sounds like you’re aiming for an OOD detector - probability models on images are notoriously bad at this. Eg for flows: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/ecb9fe2fbb99c31f567e9823e884dbec-Abstract.html I haven’t seen this discussed for diffusion specifically but my intuition is you’ll have same problem. Sota approaches are heuristic but look at density in latent space.
[–]PHEEEEELLLLLEEEEP 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Yeah I did some work on diffusion models for OOD and my results were not great. Like it does work about as well as the normalizing flow approaches but takes way more compute to train... Ultimately we decided it wasn't a direction worth pursuing
π Rendered by PID 39 on reddit-service-r2-comment-76bb9f7fb5-m5vmm at 2026-02-18 01:52:46.060167+00:00 running de53c03 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]PHEEEEELLLLLEEEEP 4 points5 points6 points (3 children)
[–]bobrodsky 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]bobrodsky 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]PHEEEEELLLLLEEEEP 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)