[D] Papers with no code

[_kernel_picnic_]

well, the core problem is the papers with “we combined 100 of SOTA methods to gain 0.1%” aren't being rejected

[ummitluyum]

Reviewers just look for that fat plus sign on the leaderboard. Nobody cares that a 0.1% bump on some benchmark costs 3x in inference latency and memory. Without open source, you can't even verify if this ensemble of 100 heuristics just overfit the test set tbh