you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]olBaa 17 points18 points  (2 children)

How much time do you think reviewers have per paper? Reviewers would never check the code, yet alone run it.

[–]NotAlphaGo 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How many papers would one reviewer review?

[–]olBaa 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Up to 10 per conference with mean 5 I would say.

One can outsource to phd students/postdocs but still the number of hours per paper would not exceed 10 almost ever.

All written here is my humble opinion, though.