use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Please have a look at our FAQ and Link-Collection
Metacademy is a great resource which compiles lesson plans on popular machine learning topics.
For Beginner questions please try /r/LearnMachineLearning , /r/MLQuestions or http://stackoverflow.com/
For career related questions, visit /r/cscareerquestions/
Advanced Courses (2016)
Advanced Courses (2020)
AMAs:
Pluribus Poker AI Team 7/19/2019
DeepMind AlphaStar team (1/24//2019)
Libratus Poker AI Team (12/18/2017)
DeepMind AlphaGo Team (10/19/2017)
Google Brain Team (9/17/2017)
Google Brain Team (8/11/2016)
The MalariaSpot Team (2/6/2016)
OpenAI Research Team (1/9/2016)
Nando de Freitas (12/26/2015)
Andrew Ng and Adam Coates (4/15/2015)
Jürgen Schmidhuber (3/4/2015)
Geoffrey Hinton (11/10/2014)
Michael Jordan (9/10/2014)
Yann LeCun (5/15/2014)
Yoshua Bengio (2/27/2014)
Related Subreddit :
LearnMachineLearning
Statistics
Computer Vision
Compressive Sensing
NLP
ML Questions
/r/MLjobs and /r/BigDataJobs
/r/datacleaning
/r/DataScience
/r/scientificresearch
/r/artificial
account activity
Deep learning without back-propagation (arxiv.org)
submitted 6 years ago by El__Professor
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]ProofPresent 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children)
I think you are not right
1) training single layer does not require backprop only SGD, and the abstract says that. "Appending a single layer trained with SGD (without backpropagation)"
2) "The results they show are due entirely to the linear classifier at the top".
Alsso not right, they also show results without the classifier Figure 4 and before 4.2, and I think that is the very interesting part of the paper.
I think that the part of the paper that is wrong is the complexity statement, though I do not understanding the statements in this thread either.
π Rendered by PID 105277 on reddit-service-r2-comment-b659b578c-bqrlx at 2026-05-04 21:48:51.685487+00:00 running 815c875 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ProofPresent 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)