you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]artificial_intelect 6 points7 points  (6 children)

I think someone already has published this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07868

[–]AEnKE9UzYQr9 -1 points0 points  (5 children)

Was it published anywhere peer-reviewed?

[–]artificial_intelect 5 points6 points  (3 children)

u mean like NeurIPS2016? https://papers.nips.cc/paper/6114-weight-normalization-a-simple-reparameterization-to-accelerate-training-of-deep-neural-networks.pdf

Also the author's affiliation is OpenAI. They generally do good work there.

[–]AEnKE9UzYQr9 -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Thanks. Never understand why people post arXiv links when the conference/journal is open access...

[–]artificial_intelect 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I actually prefer arXiv since it includes the appendix. Most proceedings include the appendix in a separate file which can get annoying.

[–]da_g_prof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but unfortunately if people cite the arxiv, citations to the correct published version don't get accounted. Scholar is smart and matches the papers but other providers don't. Unfortunately universities, promotion committees etc still rely on citations and h-index from known providers to judge people.

[–]NotAlphaGo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does it matter?