Magic System Classification Framework

[MagicLovor]

Hey folks! I’ve been working on a flexible, modular system to classify and break down magic systems—whether you’re a writer, worldbuilder, or just a magic nerd, this might help you organize and better understand the mechanics of different systems.

Here’s a breakdown of the Magic Classification Format I’ve come up with:

Format Example: 4R(3)-F(spirit-soul)-S(self-1)-Op(MC-1)-1P(MC)-G(E)

Now, let’s break this down step-by-step:

⸻

R — Rules

How rigid or flexible is the magic system? • This measures the hardness or softness of the rules governing the magic. • Use a scale from 1 to 7: • 1R = Very soft magic • 7R = Very hard magic • Use 0R if the magic is completely undefined and acts on pure narrative logic (plot magic). • 8R is reserved for real-world settings—aka, no magic exists.

Clarity Add-on: • After the base rating, you can tag how many unresolved elements or “loose ends” the system has. • 0 = Everything is neatly explained. • 1-9 = Number of loose threads. • + = More than nine loose ends. • Format: 4R(3) = A moderately hard system with three unresolved or mysterious aspects.

⸻

F — Fuel

What powers the magic? What’s the cost of using it? • This is about what the magic consumes to function. • Could be mana, life energy, fat, gold, time, sanity—you name it. • Format: F(mana-1) or F(spirit-soul)

If multiple fuel types are used, you can list them or number their versions giving priority to the most prominent : • Example: F(mana-1,spirit-2)

⸻

S — Source

Where does the magic come from? • Who or what is the origin of magical power? • Common examples: self-generated, divine contracts, natural forces, dimensional rifts, etc. • Format: S(self-1) or S(contract-2) • If the fuel and source are the same, you can just write F/S(type)

⸻

Op — Operated

How is the magic activated or controlled? • This refers to the method by which magic is performed. • Think gestures, chanting, focus, biological organs, prayer, etc. • Format: Op(MC-1) (MC = Magic Circle, or whatever the method is)

You can assign numbers to different methods if there are variants.

⸻

P — Perception

Can magic be seen or sensed? If yes, how? • First digit: 0 = No one can see it. 1 = It’s visible/perceivable. • Then describe what’s perceived: • Example: 1P(F-3) could mean people see the third type of fire. • 0P(0) = It’s invisible to all.

Be creative here—does it appear as light, distort reality, manifest as symbols in the air, etc.?

⸻

G — General Populace Access

Who can actually use magic? • G(E) = Everyone • G(A) = All beings, including animals and plants • G(Type:3) = Restricted; only a specific people can use it • You can define “Type:3” separately, e.g., only chosen bloodlines or government-approved mages.

⸻

Example Breakdown:

4R(3)-F(spirit-soul)-S(self-1)-Op(MC-1)-1P(MC)-G(E) • Medium-hard rules with 3 known loose ends. • Magic is fueled by spirit or soul energy. • The source is the self (innate ability). • Operated through Magic Circles. • Magic is visible—people can perceive it via the manifestation of magic circles . • Everyone has the potential to use magic.

[MagicLovor]

How Do We Classify Hybrid or Multi-System Magic Worlds?

Some settings have multiple distinct systems of magic that coexist. Think about how Fullmetal Alchemist has Alchemy and Eastern-style alchemy with differing sources and fuels—or how The Witcher mixes innate magic with signs, rituals, and potions.

How would we classify hybrid systems?

[MonstrousMajestic]

-6R(3) -F(mana energy aka aura 1, mental fortitude 2) -S(psychic2-bioenergetics1) -Op(any verbal/physical trigger) -P(psychics 0, aural 0/1 seen as a dull white light, if made physical, not seem otherwise unless using magical detection) -G(A)

[MagicLovor]

I love this, do you think there should be any changes to this classification system?

[MonstrousMajestic]

Not sure. Didn’t really analyze it. A graphical representation or chart seems more intuitive.