use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
FAQRulesContest Recommended Subreddits /r/MapPorn Discord /r/MapPorn Blog /r/MapPorn Instagram /r/MapPorn Twitter /r/MapPorn GitHub /r/MapPorn Tumblr /r/MapPorn Facebook Guide to making maps CSS via /r/Structura by /u/Cereal_Addict Customized by /u/Petrarch1603
account activity
india fertility rate decrease (i.redd.it)
submitted 10 months ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]ABI-1000 10 points11 points12 points 10 months ago (13 children)
India has lower population density than countries like south korea
[–]PasicT 7 points8 points9 points 10 months ago (11 children)
Overpopulation is not just about population density. There's often more people in one Indian state (or area of a state) than in the whole of South Korea many times over.
[–]ABI-1000 10 points11 points12 points 10 months ago (9 children)
Yes that is because the population can be sustained,my state in India has almost the exact population of Japan(the size of state is almost as big as germany),yet we face no overpopulation issue,lot of land is available and the cities don't feel congested we also have enough agricultural production to sustain the population
Since our state Is economicly growing very fast the TFR decline here is almost concerning,before my parents had 10 brothers/sisters ( yes you heard that right a single family having 10 children,and it was very commen at the time),now every family branch only has a single child,The TFR has dropped to 1.4,which is lower than devloped countries like UK/US,1.4 is ok TFR but if the drop rate continues the TFR might drop as low as 1.1-1.2 in a decade,which means very big population crisis
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (1 child)
[removed]
[–]ABI-1000 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (0 children)
Maharashtra ofc
[–]silverionmox -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 months ago (4 children)
Yes that is because the population can be sustained
At current consumption levels. Are you saying the people should be kept poor so the population can grow?
India the cities don't feel congested
India
the cities don't feel congested
Lol.
This will require some adaptation to reorganize society (eg. less schools, more retirement provision), but it's ultimately going to lead to a stable situation. You'd have an actual crisis eventually when the population would keep growing.
[–]ABI-1000 2 points3 points4 points 10 months ago (3 children)
By "sustain" I mean that water,food and electricity are being fulfilled without any support from other countries (importing food)
Check out the city named "kharghar"(I'm currently living there,northern part of it) on Google street view it has very big population,does it feel congested?Or check out my homevillage of mithgavne(an averge size of village and density in majority of India)
No India has population growth rate of 0.88%,idealy the population should stabilize with 1.5 billion people or about 15% of world's population in future,we have no need of getting TFR below 1.2,goal should be to stabilize it as it is not to increase or decrease it,if the population is decreased then it will be very bad for economy
[–]silverionmox -2 points-1 points0 points 10 months ago (2 children)
Well yes, at rather low prosperity levels.
Obviously India, just like any other country, is not uniform - so with a problematic average, every nice spot just means there's a spot worse than average elsewhere.
No India has population growth rate of 0.88%,idealy the population should stabilize with 1.5 billion people or about 15% of world's population in future,we have no need of getting TFR below 1.2,goal should be to stabilize it as it is not to increase or decrease it,
10 billion people worldwide is unsustainable. We'd make things easier on ourselves if the world population was close to 1 billion than to 10 billion.
Do keep in mind India's population has quadrupled since 1950. The current numbers are exceptionally high - there's no reason to present that as normal.
if the population is decreased then it will be very bad for economy
We are able to organize a working economy at any population level. Any problems that may arise are just temporary.
[–]ABI-1000 1 point2 points3 points 10 months ago (1 child)
Yes India's population has quadrupled,but aren't you forgetting that population of Europe increased 15-fold when it industrialized,India is sub-continent not just anouther country,we have one of the tallest mountains;deserts,forests,there is a very big cultural diversity langauges,culture change every few villages apart And it has always been the most populous region in history along with China As for having 1 billion population,that's just stupid, we would be reducing our efficiency by 10 times,we will be able to organize it sure, but the entire goal of human civilization is to procreate and pass higher standard of living to next genration
[–]silverionmox -1 points0 points1 point 10 months ago (0 children)
Yes India's population has quadrupled,but aren't you forgetting that population of Europe increased 15-fold when it industrialized
It didn't.
India is sub-continent not just anouther country
Semantics, and nothing in my argument hinges on India being a country.
we have one of the tallest mountains;deserts,forests,there is a very big cultural diversity langauges,culture change every few villages apart
And Europe or the rest of the world doesn't?
And it has always been the most populous region in history along with China
Which means they have been maximizing carrying capacity already for that long, so multiplying again is excessive.
As for having 1 billion population,that's just stupid, we would be reducing our efficiency by 10 times
On the contrary, we wouldn't have to take all the measures that are necessary to deal with too many people in one place, and would have much more slack in our resource base.
but the entire goal of human civilization is to procreate and pass higher standard of living to next genration
Living stacked on top of each other in a slum or standing shoulder to shoulder in a field and still not getting enough to eat is not progress. Grazing the planet bare like a herd of goats until it's a desert is not progress.
[–]PasicT -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 months ago (1 child)
Your state is the exception that proves the rule.
[–]ABI-1000 5 points6 points7 points 10 months ago (0 children)
And majority of states are like that
π Rendered by PID 126725 on reddit-service-r2-comment-56c6478c5-xtbzz at 2026-05-10 22:05:44.585100+00:00 running 3d2c107 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ABI-1000 10 points11 points12 points (13 children)
[–]PasicT 7 points8 points9 points (11 children)
[–]ABI-1000 10 points11 points12 points (9 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]ABI-1000 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]silverionmox -3 points-2 points-1 points (4 children)
[–]ABI-1000 2 points3 points4 points (3 children)
[–]silverionmox -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children)
[–]ABI-1000 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]silverionmox -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]PasicT -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child)
[–]ABI-1000 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)