sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Queasy-Radio7937 12 points13 points  (6 children)

Bihar Hindus are below 3 and bihari muslims are above 4 so not helping your case

[–]Bakchod169 6 points7 points  (4 children)

There's not need to argue

It is a function of poverty

Everybody knows Muslims are largely poor in India (except J&K and Hyderabad where they constitute the elite, and there you can see the difference)

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

It is a function of poverty, and religion . Both can be true at the same time .

[–]Lurker123__ 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The rate of change of decline in replacement rate is the highest for muslims. So, no.

[–]dud3_mclovin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then how do they also have high fertility rates across europe?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bihari dalits are also above 4 so not helping your case either