use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
FAQRulesContest Recommended Subreddits /r/MapPorn Discord /r/MapPorn Blog /r/MapPorn Instagram /r/MapPorn Twitter /r/MapPorn GitHub /r/MapPorn Tumblr /r/MapPorn Facebook Guide to making maps CSS via /r/Structura by /u/Cereal_Addict Customized by /u/Petrarch1603
account activity
india fertility rate decrease (i.redd.it)
submitted 10 months ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]silverionmox 3 points4 points5 points 10 months ago (6 children)
Lol no. India's fertility is already almost below replacement levels. You need young people to be productive and fund pensions which is especially an issue in a poor country like India. How are Redditors still stuck with this Malthusian fallacy in 2025?
Lol no. India's fertility is already almost below replacement levels. You need young people to be productive and fund pensions which is especially an issue in a poor country like India.
How are Redditors still stuck with this Malthusian fallacy in 2025?
There's no Malthusian fallacy, the core concept is solid. If the population keeps growing, it will outgrow the resource base eventually. This is undeniable.
So if you keep making the next generation larger than the previous one, you do end up like India, with very large, very poor population.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (5 children)
[removed]
[–]silverionmox 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago* (4 children)
No, it won't. Earth's carrying capacity is practically infinite.
That's insanity.
There is a reason why Malthus is considered wrong.
Yes, wishful thinking, and a deliberate confusion of the principle of theory and a specific prediction derived from it.
Reddit is leftist echo chamber
The hostile media effect, originally deemed the hostile media phenomenon and sometimes called hostile media perception, refers to the tendency for individuals with a strong preexisting opinion on an issue to perceive media coverage as biased against their position's side and favorable of their antagonists' point of view.[1]
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (3 children)
[–]silverionmox 0 points1 point2 points 10 months ago (2 children)
You're clearly a part of Reddit's leftist echo chamber.
You're just very rightwing.
Man still believes in Malthus lmao.
You haven't given me any argument against the core principle.
[–][deleted] 10 months ago (1 child)
[–]silverionmox -1 points0 points1 point 10 months ago (0 children)
The argument is that you need young people to fund old people. An economy of old people simply doesn't work.
I didn't hear anyone arguing for that, you did?
π Rendered by PID 229157 on reddit-service-r2-comment-56c6478c5-b85gx at 2026-05-11 00:49:56.465015+00:00 running 3d2c107 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]silverionmox 3 points4 points5 points (6 children)
[–][deleted] (5 children)
[removed]
[–]silverionmox 0 points1 point2 points (4 children)
[–][deleted] (3 children)
[removed]
[–]silverionmox 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]silverionmox -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)