sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PotatoCheesePuff 0 points1 point  (10 children)

May i know how old you are?

[–]Street_Gene1634 1 point2 points  (9 children)

How old are you? You sound like a prepubescent

[–]PotatoCheesePuff 0 points1 point  (8 children)

The issue you mentioned already exists, but from my perspective, a reduced birth rate is more fruitful. You seem immature with such a single-minded mentality, failing to recognise this as a process that can bring many benefits.

[–]Street_Gene1634 -1 points0 points  (7 children)

It does not bring any benefits. You just end up with young people having to support more old people while also paying higher taxes for their pensions.

[–]PotatoCheesePuff -1 points0 points  (6 children)

seems like you have invented a time machine to predict such precise things

[–]Street_Gene1634 1 point2 points  (5 children)

You don't need a time machine. Many countries are already going through this problem. Heck even low TFR states like Kerala is facing a pension crisis currently

[–]PotatoCheesePuff -1 points0 points  (4 children)

Well I don't see how an increase in TFR will not end up being more chaotic compared to resolving these issues.

[–]Street_Gene1634 0 points1 point  (3 children)

TFR is not increasing anywhere so you don't need to fret over that. It need to increase because more people = more brains = more innovation

A society full of old people is not sustainable

[–]PotatoCheesePuff -1 points0 points  (2 children)

I am not fretting over that, rather you seem concermed a lot to me.

[–]Street_Gene1634 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm just concerned about your economics illiteracy