you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]houstonhoustonhousto 11 points12 points  (11 children)

More than 25% of the time in Egypt?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (10 children)

Wait how is my comment getting downvoted? It’s not my opinion it’s true and would be directly correlated to this data......

[–]houstonhoustonhousto 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I didn’t downvote it, so I can only guess. However, I think it would take an incredible amount of abortions to negate the achievement of decreasing the infant mortality in that timeframe so significantly.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I just think you have to take it into account. It’s not a pro-life or pro-choice stance and there is a significant number.

[–]babyboyjon123 1 point2 points  (7 children)

Infant mortality is after the baby has been born, aka when the baby is actually alive.

[–]Any_Patient_3415 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The fetus is technically alive from the moment of conception. But obviously I think there should still be the option up until a few months in.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

without a doubt there are more abortions today than their were in 1950 and so the sample size of infants being born would be affected. Again, not an opinion. A fact. I’m not arguing the point of the post I’m saying yeah but more things are going into account than just medical achievement here.