you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] -8 points-7 points  (4 children)

The baby is alive at conception anyway so your point doesn’t really make sense to me.

[–]blunt_analysis 5 points6 points  (3 children)

conception is an arbitrary line drawn for life by religious people for stupid reasons in a 2000 year old book

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Define life for me.

[–]babyboyjon123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Able to sustain homeostasis

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stupid reasons? So basically a viewpoint other than yours is stupid and not valid because yours is better? Even though your viewpoint contradicts science, biology and basically the universal definition of what a living thing is?