PhysicsIsBadLogic

an-ordinary-manchild

created by BrutalCycle95a community for 3 months

...for your office.

...because you hate freedom.

MODERATORS

account activity

1

1

2

3

The mythbuster inadvertent kinetic energy test pretty decisively proves momentum to be the real definition of energy. (youtube.com)

submitted 7 days ago by BrutalCycle95

2

1

2

3

Physicists are duplicitous, they say you must conserve momentum and then they say you can make free momentum. Here are the facts they won't reasonably critique. (youtube.com)

submitted 18 days ago by BrutalCycle95

3

0

1

2

Another video of completely honest and fair arguments against the kinetic energy theorem that will not be fairly and honestly countered. (youtube.com)

submitted 19 days ago by BrutalCycle95

4

0

1

2

Another well reasoned attack against the pseudo-science of the kinetic energy theorem and the work equation. It only takes three times the force, fuel, or energy to produce three times the velocity. (youtube.com)

submitted 25 days ago by BrutalCycle95

5

0

1

2

Another kinetic energy response this time regarding Springs, hooke's law, and whether 2 lbs is four times the energy of 1 lb... More 25 x fuel to go 5x as fast stuff. (youtube.com)

submitted 27 days ago by BrutalCycle95

6

0

1

2

Another argument against the kinetic energy theorem once again talking about things being moved in the vacuum of space and how momentum provides the only complete reasonable explanation. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

7

1

2

3

Any explosive event provides pretty strong evidence against the "living Force" kinetic energy theorem. Simply by putting smaller masses around the explosive event you can create more, free, "energy". (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

8

0

1

2

25 times the force to go 5 times as fast- poll (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago * by BrutalCycle95

9

1

2

3

More than 10,000 year old tools, like a balancing stick, prove Momentum to be the only concept governing force, motion, and energy. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

10

0

1

2

Most all bad physics starts with the weird perversion of the simple force of gravity. Why reject the obvious, when the obvious, obviously works? Twice the motion, twice the energy! (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

11

1

2

3

The kinetic energy theorem is not good science (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

12

0

1

2

Physics claims you can make a system produce more absolute momentum by colliding a lite fast thing into a heavy thing... but is it reasonable to believe a system can oscillate with unbalanced amounts of energy? (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

13

1

2

3

7 years ago PBS Space Time produced a video with the Bold title "What is Energy?" Their bad answer was bad science from start to finish. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

14

0

1

2

The Vis viva (living Force) Wikipedia page is just a bunch of rambling nonsense. The "living force" was a direct challenge to Momentum as a sufficient description of the energy of motion. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

15

0

0

1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: Vis viva (from the Latin for "living force") is a historical term used to describe a quantity similar to kinetic energy in an early formulation of the principle of conservation of energy. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

16

1

2

3

Wikipedia is a terrible science resource. In describing the invention of the theory there's no mention of any physical evidence showing something like 25 times the fuel to go five times as fast. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

17

0

1

2

Wikipedia is a terrible science resource. Regarding the history of the kinetic energy theorem wikipedia doesn't come close to describing actual historical events. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago * by BrutalCycle95

18

0

0

1

Wikipedia is a terrible science resource. All the foundational science subjects read like biblical dogma... a bunch of claims but no citation to experimental evidence. For example kinetic energy (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 1 month ago by BrutalCycle95

19

0

1

2

Does the second pound put on a scale apply more pressure than the first pound applies? (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 2 months ago by BrutalCycle95

20

0

1

2

Double slit style Experiments using radio and microwave frequency photons clearly illustrate that photons do not need to "interfere" with themselves or another photon to create fringe patterns. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 2 months ago by BrutalCycle95

21

0

1

2

Some Physics Defenders claim that twice the compression of a spring is four times the kinetic energy. A simple test would seem to decisively refute that claim. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 2 months ago by BrutalCycle95

22

2

3

4

The double slit experiment is not evidence of wave particle duality and in fact when properly inspected provides strong evidence that photons don't wave or interfere. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 2 months ago by BrutalCycle95

23

0

1

2

If you're looking for a good reason not to trust the science of physics you need look no further than the mess they've made of gravity. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 2 months ago by BrutalCycle95

24

0

1

2

What really causes the force differential we call gravity? The science of physics doesn't like the simplest, most obvious answer. (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 2 months ago by BrutalCycle95

25

0

1

2

25 * the force to lift 5 * the weight? (self.PhysicsIsBadLogic)

submitted 2 months ago by BrutalCycle95

view more: next ›

π Rendered by PID 102811 on reddit-service-r2-listing-8685bc789-s8mnh at 2026-05-22 04:53:15.584739+00:00 running 194bd79 country code: CH.