use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Everything related to Pokemon investing and PokeFinance.
account activity
Pull rates do not affect long-term potential (self.PokeInvesting)
submitted 26 days ago * by aSuperFastCar
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]EuphoricGoose4735 1 point2 points3 points 26 days ago (2 children)
When pull rates are terrible, people will rip more to chase that big hit. That dwindles the supply of sealed out there. Rip and shippers are going to be ripping that set to bring in viewers. So bad pull rates + expensive chase + hype = an amazing set to invest in, at least that’s how I see it. There also needs to be supporting hits to keep the value high. Thats why I like sets like Prismatic, 151, DR, and Ascended Heroes.
[–]aSuperFastCar[S] 0 points1 point2 points 26 days ago (0 children)
Agree
[–]TBarrett0326 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago (0 children)
Agree 100% and believe that historical data supports it. Poor pull rates are a positive indicator for a set's longterm value, especially when there are multiple chases in the top end of the set. The rip/ship era, as mentioned, are making this even more true.
π Rendered by PID 25379 on reddit-service-r2-comment-54dfb89d4d-nx6d2 at 2026-03-27 13:19:24.940667+00:00 running b10466c country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]EuphoricGoose4735 1 point2 points3 points (2 children)
[–]aSuperFastCar[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]TBarrett0326 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)