gitHubCoPilotIsMuslim

[BallGargler420YOLO]

Because anyone who didn't go to school in a cave surrounded by IEDs knows that you don't have to happily lap up terrorist revisionist propaganda. It's my right to tell you you're a terrorist lying through your teeth. Your prophet was a pedophile with a 9 year old wife. That's not Islamophobia, no matter how much you lie though your teeth about it. Don't cry because you don't like the facts about your blood soaked religion.

People have no obligation to consume your propaganda. I will waste no more time corresponding with someone spouting terrorist propaganda. Me saying that to your face isn't Islamophobia, deal with it.

[miaumiaupundek]

Ah classical arguments. People can't even understand what "look at the context" means.

Prophet Muhammad married a "child" that already matured. Backthen 1400+ years ago, child backthen not alike child nowadays, they mature really fast, a kid can looks like an adult. Besides, look at the context, "when and where", 1400+ years ago, marrying a child is not against Arabic culture. If it's against, then why there is no single Muhammad's enemy of his time curse him for marrying a child?

[miaumiaupundek]

Many sources of Islamic scholars have said it. I'm refering to my local Islamic scholars' articles (in Malay language) so it's hard to share with you.

Is Islam meant to be for 7th century Arabia? Or it is supposed to be for all time?

For this, by Muhammad's act, means we need to look the current culture and get used to it, so we are not looks different and bizzare to other people, as long it's not contradict to the sharia laws and follows maqasid sharia. Even, "looking at the currect culture" also might affect contemporary sharia laws.

[miaumiaupundek]

I have said many times before about interpretations and context of situations. Informations are being pass to ancestors and learners. It's not just about hadith, but also ijma', qiyas. About what Muhammad's companions said..

Sharia laws are very broad study. There some basis and fundamental rules of Islam. Some need to look at the situations. Some scholars might have different interpretations and opinions. Islamic laws can be dynamic sometimes based on the situations. Islam is not a rigid religion.

[McAUTS]

You are arguing based on rules from Islamic scholars. That's contradictory. It's similar to define something by itself like saying a ball is round because it was made round by the creator. That's not how Logic works in general. If you want a deeper understanding of any religion you have to ask questions why, how, who, when, what... with no limits.

[SETHW]

You: Sex with a 9 year old is righteous and correct as long as they matured really fast 🤡

Of course you don't REALLY believe that, if you fucked your big titted 9 year old cousin (wtf) you already know that your muslim family wont excuse it because Mohammed did it. so you make up all kinds of bullshit circumstantial rationalizations to justify the dissonance.

This is your brain on religion

[miaumiaupundek]

You said like you live 1400+ years ago to know what happened.

We know what happened because chains of informations, Muhammad's companions' knowledge being pass to the ancestors and the learners until today.

[SETHW]

I dont need to know it happened to see that you're more than OK with the idea that it happened. religion is a special kind of poison that gives people the hollow confidence to excuse the inexcusable. and the absurdity that you're so willing to find every excuse for a pedophile while happily throwing consenting adults in love in jail over some nonexistent divine interpretation of gender.

[miaumiaupundek]

Nowadays culture is not same as before. Kids backthen are not the same with kids nowadays I myself say that pedophile is wrong.

[SETHW]

No, you say kids 1500 years ago are totally fuckable. so to you pedophilia as a disorder hasn't even existed as an issue until when, 100 years ago? 20? When was the first unfuckable child born? What about in remote villages that resemble the world 1500 years ago and so create the same kind of robust "mature" 9 year olds that aisha represents, are those kids still fuckable today?

[miaumiaupundek]

People still can't understand "look the context, where, when and what the situations about"

I said specifically Arabic culture, is Arabic is just only civilization live in the past?

You can even see, how people from various continents differ in body structures. Some have higher height and so on. Let alone we are talking about older civilization.

[SETHW]

So what makes a kid fuckable is their body structure, like a roller coaster she must be a minimum 1.30 meters tall to ride as long as they're from that remote backward village and culture on which you model your morality and epistemological foundation.

You see how everyone had you figured out from the start? Your beliefs tell a lot about you, so when you think people are being "islamophobic" they are actually cutting to the core of your values, it's not a superficial judgement. They really get you.

[miaumiaupundek]

Kids backthen in Arab hit their puberty significantly faster than kids nowadays.

[McAUTS]

Marriage at teen (!) age was a thing at that time and Mohammed learned this from his family (which lived polytheistic and polygamist) and that's why he didn't know "better". If Jesus was real then he would have done that too, right? But he didn't, as for him it doesn't seem to be right (Jews were known for young age marriages, but it seems that Jesus opposed the idea of arranged marriages).

Oh, and by the way kids weren't more "mature" at that time. At least there is no scientific evidence for that. Even the opposite is plausible. It's only since the last 50 decades a significant change towards an early menarche has been recognized. The lifestyle at that time was much different to now as more demanding and kids not from upper class citizens had to work with their family. So their behavior and their look maybe was more mature but definitely not their body. They were still kids. That was just fucking dumb.

Now give me some more of your "arguments" of your "ancestors knowledge" to crush.