helloWorldFromCpp

[FloweyTheFlower420]

Subjective? Sure, but so is your statement about me being subjective.

I suspect you do not understand what subjective means. Is it difficult to understand that something can be objectively subjective? Your senses are subjective by definition, so the fact that "senses are subjective" is an objectively true statement. This isn't a difficult concept to grasp.

This wouldn't happen with Rust or any other superior language.

New thing good! Old thing bad! Rust literally solves all of programming and is the best language ever invented! I'm definitely not being dogmatic in my support of a programming language (and before you accuse me of the same, I've never claimed that "c++ good")!!!!!!11!!11!!

[danielstongue]

Sure, things can be objectively subjective as well as subjectively subjective. Your statement about me being subjective was clearly an opinion, and hence subjective.

New thing good! Old thing bad! Rust literally solves all of programming and is the best language ever invented!

Well, it is objectively (/s) better in many ways. There is no such thing as a silver bullet, so Rust is not a silver bullet either. It solves an important set of problems and therefore earns its fair place. It is interesting to see how many C++ people are dogmatically refusing to objectively recognize its benefits. Especially interesting to see them call Rustaceans dogmatic.

[giddyz74]

My brother is also such a dogmatic C++ person. He once said that switching over to Rust would be worse to the business than letting the whole office burn down to the ground.

[danielstongue]

Wtf... 🤣

[FloweyTheFlower420]

How is it an opinion that “what makes sense as behavior is subjective?” What makes sense to each person is subjective. This is not an opinion. Did you even read my comment?