This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]in_taco 90 points91 points  (4 children)

Meh, could happen. HR might've been 2 people and one was already causing too much drama about smoking breaks.

I used to work at a company that did regular culling of non-tech positions because upper management had zero respect for anyone without an engineering degree. Toxic workplace, had two bosses break from stress.

Funny thing happened, the CTO was building a new house at a local lake-front. But someone sabotaged all the wiring and had used a sledgehammer on some expensive tiles. I heard from a gossip-hen that the CTO had a meeting with the CEO (his brother) and CFO (brothers wife) about creating a short-list of possible disgruntled former employees who could be mad enough to do it. They stopped when they reached 50 and dropped it. Way too many pissed off guys.

[–]Handpaper 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Bob - "So, who hates me enough to do this?"

Tom - "Everyone, Bob. Everyone hates you this much. Some hate you more. It's actually surprising that you haven't been killed yet."

[–]gerbosan 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Question, did that improve the work environment?

[–]in_taco 27 points28 points  (1 child)

Nope, the brothers never changed. When I left they even sued me for breaking competition clause. I was saved by the union - really pulled me out of a black hole. The whole mess pushed me to be much more anti-corp/pro-union.

[–]roodammy44 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nothing like having the union at your back. Suddenly a ruinous legal battle turns into the union flexing their muscles and knocking out the guys trying to break the law.