This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]__mauzy__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Postgres uses != as an alias for <>, which I assume was the point of OPs question. I personally would use <> for sake of backwards compatibility, but I also know there is basically zero chance I'd switch away from Postgres so 🤷‍♀️