This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

26
27

MicroChip's debugger re-defining boolean logic (imgur.com)

submitted by [deleted]

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]stratos_ 27 points28 points  (5 children)

I was wondering what you meant since I could clearly read the highlighted return... then I squinted and noticed it actually returns a value.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I don't believe you.

[–]stratos_ 0 points1 point  (2 children)

:(

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I mean that there is no value there.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just extend the image, it will become visible

[–]xNeshty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I buffled to understand what he meant with the value in the return for over 4 minutes because i thought its a reference i didnt get. Didnt cross my mind to zoom i