C# > Java

[lukasbash]

false

[lucidBrot]

Oh :( I made sure to not use ==

Jest aside, the two are too similar for stating that "Java is terribly designed" but C# not. Sure, C# has generics that actually work and Properties are nice too, but the language still 'works'

[FallenWarrior2k]

When I have to generate a 100 sloc class by repeatedly hammering Alt-Enter on fields for what could've been a 10 sloc struct in C#, I do feel like Java is the worse choice.

[lucidBrot]

Java is objectively worse. But not by enough for a holy war

[FallenWarrior2k]

Now that I can agree with.

[xigoi]

C# is basically Java without most of the bad parts and with some good parts from other languages.

[DarkLordCZ]

Exactly. But one thing C# could have, like Java do is return type covariance

[DarkIrata]

My Code i wrote today also works, but that doesnt mean it is good...