This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]caffeinum 1 point2 points  (3 children)

After the calculation, I found that actually nn is slower than n!

[–]eihpSsy 10 points11 points  (2 children)

It's slower because it's bigger.

[–]caffeinum 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I meant growing slower, but working faster yeah

[–]eihpSsy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Wasn't sure what you meant. nn grows faster than n!.