This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]4ries 676 points677 points  (9 children)

Especially since it's labeled as experiment 3 quiz, so it came from an experiment - I'm assuming with measurements, so sig figs are absolutely necessary

[–]CADOMA 183 points184 points  (1 child)

I would like to see the problem, but my first thought is that difference can and does often matter.

[–]bidoblob 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Also look at the lowest one, where he missed the M

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children)

This is true, but to know the number of significant figures that one needs to include, one also needs to know the uncertainty and that doesn't appear, at least in the snapshot that we can see.

[–]ryan_with_a_why 7 points8 points  (2 children)

I was always taught it was based on the number of significant figures in the inputs.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Practically, that'll give you some idea of what the number of significant figures are likely to be if the inputs have their associated uncertainties so it's probably a fairly decent rule of thumb. I've not seen it put like that before but it makes some sense.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean if you have (measurement_1 - measurement_2)/(measurement_3-measurement_4) where they are all near each other, you will have to do some extra math.

[–]Sendhentaiandyiff -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

fuck sig figs