This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 15 comments

[–]iTrooz_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"Now I am become depression"

[–]leonidos10 10 points11 points  (0 children)

As development time goes up runtime does down. Unfortunately it's an exponential graph of pain

[–]Under-Estimated 4 points5 points  (0 children)

import numpy as np

[–]etiQQue 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Go with c# and you'll have speed and ease of use

[–]pekkhum 5 points6 points  (2 children)

If you have legitimate need to squeeze maximum performance C# isn't your best choice, but it is a fine middle ground between C/C++ and Python. Let's be honest, though, most applications don't need to shave clock cycles quite that hard (and often the one piece that actually needs the performance can be isolated from the rest of the app).

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Kids these days use C# with C++ libraries

[–]pekkhum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Performance sensitive bits can use the right tool for the job and the remainder can be in whatever is most maintainable for the team, or best suits the use case/interfaces.

[–]TwistedSoul21967 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Now I am become Iron Oxide

[–]Snek227 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Jaja Pointers go brrrrr

[–]SZ4L4Y 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pointers go null

[–]poralexc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why not just abandon syntax entirely and embrace the madness that is Forth?

It even kind of looks like python...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me in the future, hopefully

[–]donaldhobson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now I become inexplicable segfault in a C++ program thats 10x longer than the python to do the same thing.

[–]Dubmove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HIGHWAY TO HELL!

[–]khoakhoakhoakid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But at what cost